STOP KILLING US - BLACK LIVES MATTER
We demand an end to death-by-cop.
When we consider specific issues of discrimination, race
still trumps class.
by Darryl Lorenzo Wellington. The Crisis, Winter 2015
"Something happening here / What it is ain't exactly
clear" sang the Buffalo Springfield, in a song that become definitive of
the cultural shifts of the 1960s. The Obama years - meaning the period since
2008 - have also sent ripples, even shock waves through the cultural lives of
most Americans. Something indeed is happening here and now in America. I don't
mean that it is the "hope and change" Obama sloganized in 2008, and
yet Obama's election has inadvertently been a catalyst. I don't mean that this
awakening is leading us toward the light; indeed, that's happening is that we
have been peering more honestly into the abyss. I do mean that, despite so many
frustrations, setbacks and strange twists, the past seven years created fertile
ground for the reconsideration and excavation of two perpetual themes in
American public and intellectual life. They're not new themes. They've always
been with us, however obscured, coded or politicized.
Haven't you guessed them yet? The themes that have always
brooded beneath the surface, conveniently glossed over until they are roused by
public outcry against a new recession, or another incident of police brutality.
Class exists. Race matters. Class creates, or diminishes opportunity. Race
impacts lives, and minority citizenship at the bottom of the social ladder has
destroyed lives. These should be old truism. These should be stark naked
truths. Yet it has taken colorblind idealism, triumphant joy, reactionary
racism and widespread shock to seriously begin to unclothe them. It has taken
shock after shock throughout the Obama years to begin to make Americans
consciously aware of the truths that should be self-evident.
The first shock was that a Black Man with a moderately
reformist agenda won the hearts of millions of voters. How could America be racist, if a Black Man
ascended to the White House? How could the country not be the land of equal
opportunity? In a wave of enthusiasm, hypnotized by Obama's eloquence, for a
brief post-election moment the questions appeared rhetorical. In fact, they
were starkly answerable.
People remembered that in 2008 Obama had delivered "A
More Perfect Union," a speech in which he tendered the possibility that
America could resolve its problems with class and race together, ignoring the distinctions and
refusing to play "a zero sum gain." But while he spoke the upper
echelons of the White working class were experiencing unprecedented economic
disenfranchisement. The housing mortgage crisis made relatively secure
middle-class Americans aware of the worsening gap between themselves and the
truly insulated wealthy. The financial sector reeled; the troubled banks and
corporations were bailed out while, in the words of the Occupy Wall Street
movement, "We got sold out!"
The Occupy movement sharpened the American critique of the
financial sector by posing a very broad critique of class. From its beginnings
in New York City's Zuccotti Park, where the outraged Occupiers camped out and
parodied Wall Street bureaucracy, its main meme was "We are the 99
percent!" But the meme that underscored class was itself annoyingly
classist.
It referred to the statistic that a privileged one percent
of Americans owned 40 percent of the national wealth; in other words all the
collected wealth of 99 percent of Americans amounted to substantially less than
a privileged one percent.
Occupy camps spread across the country. If the middle class
was unhealthy, and lacked chances of upward mobility, so the message went, then
they would do whatever they had to do to take back public space and political
power. Although Occupiers were usually legitimately struggling, they were
playing at being hoboes. The movement's failure to respect the cultural and
economic diversity within the 99 percent became a weakness.
Perhaps the initial Occupiers honestly believed, with the
characteristic presumptiveness of White privilege, that a great victory in race
had been summarily achieved. Such thinking suggested that class obviously trumped
race, if a Black president was undercutting the middle class and bailing out
the banks. Hence, they reasoned, the time was ripe to sharpen the distinction
between opportunities offered the super wealthy and rest of us.
For Black Americans considering the Occupy movement, this
was problematic. First of all, the Occupy camps suffered from troubles along
race lines. Blacks were often in conflict with others in the movement over how
to deal with the truly poor and the homeless. Difficulties accumulated as the
indigent joined the movement, or in some cases flooded the camps. Many
Occupiers were simply embarrassed by them. Efforts were made to expand the
objectives of the movement to incorporate issues of gender, sexuality, race and
homelessness. But they by and large remained ineffectual.
The Occupy Movement asked Blacks to look at the power dynamics
emanating from above, and critique a corporatocracy whose influence was
rampant, unmerited and had to be reigned in by structural changes. But when
Blacks in the movement looked at who really subsisted at the bottom of the 99
percent, was the overwhelming preponderance of people of color only a
coincidence?
For all it merits, Occupy failed to appreciate that there
could not be an end to racial politics without addressing the structural issues
that had afflicted Blacks long before the housing crash. The question that
haunted politically conscious Black Americans was not how could race still
matter with Obama in the White House. The conundrum was how could a country
that elected a Black president still passively let segregated ghettos, and
large oases of socia-economic 'hopelessness remain intact? And turn a blind eye
on the rates of Black child poverty and Black incarceration? How could Black
people and Native Americans remain the most afflicted of the 99 percent? When we
consider specific issues of discrimination, race still trumps class. How could
America deny that Black lives mattered?
Black youth in America led the way in encouraging activism
that refocused attention away from the clout of the super wealthy and toward
systemic racial oppression, particularly in the criminal justice system.
Irrational tragedies, provoked them. Trayvon Martin's murder. Eric Garner's
murder. Mike Brown's murder. A new challenge was born out of the outrage that
escalated after each of these killings was legally sanctioned. "Black
Lives Matter is an ideological and political intervention in a world where
Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise. It is an
affirmation of Black folks' contributions to this society, our humanity, and
our resilience in the face of deadly oppression" writes Alicia Garza, a
cultural worker in Oakland, California who founded Black Lives Matter alongside
Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi. In the same way that Occupy had socially transformative
ambitions beyond reforming banking practices, Black Lives Matter, writes Garza,
"goes beyond the narrow nationalism that can be prevalent within some
Black communities, which merely call on Black people to love Black, live Black
and buy Black. Black Lives Matter affirms the lives of Black queer and trans
folks, disabled folks, Black undocumented folks, folks with records, women and
all Black lives along the gender spectrum. When we say Black Lives Matter, we
are talking about the ways in which Black people are deprived of our basic
human rights and dignity."
Facebook Activism
It's important to distinguish between a hashtag, a movement
(singular) and many movements. Black Lives Matter is an organization (singular)
founded in 2013 shortly after George Zimmerman was acquitted in the killing of
Trayvon Martin. Black Lives Matter soon found that its social media and Twitter
hashtag resonated, a banner with broad appeal. Other equally dedicated
organizations, were founded in the wake of the failures of grand juries to
indict the police officers responsible in the deaths of Garner and Brown. The
phrase "Black Lives Matter" is often used as a convenient banner
encompassing the groups that responded to recent events by disseminating
protest - both online and in the streets. They include Dream Defenders, The
Million Hoodies Movement for Justice, Millennial Activists United and other
youth-oriented groups in Ferguson, Mo.
One quality that these youth-led movements share is a heavy
investment in social media networking. A few years ago "Facebook
activism" was often criticized for being an idle millennial generation
pastime. But by now the evidence has gathered to the point of certainty that
social media is a primary 21st century tool. From late last year to MLK Day
2015, "Facebook activism" efficiently organized thousands of marchers
in protests against systemic racism and injustice in law enforcement. The
leaders of the protests ubiquitously say the swift escalation of a nationwide
Black Lives Matter movement would not have been possible without social media.
Activist DeRay Mckesson has worked primarily from Ferguson, where police officer
Darren Wilson shot Mike Brown to death. He calls social media the next step in
the war against silence. "The history of blackness is also a history of
erasure." Mckesson says.
Social "media has given protesters an amplified voice.
Because of "Facebook activism," information about the killing of Mike
Brown spread like wildfire alongside stories and facts about Black life in
Ferguson. These authentic accounts of the prevalence of racism and
apartheid-level disenfranchisement soon made Ferguson into a symbol of an
America in which too little has changed. Mckesson says it happened because
"We were able to document that in a way that we never could have without
social media. We were able to tell our own stories. What was powerful in the
context of Ferguson is that there were many people able to tell their story as
the story unfolded."
In November 2014, activists from various groups protesting
in Ferguson or marching against police brutality were granted an audience with
President Obama. Participants in the meeting say being given 45 minutes with
the president confirmed that their work had garnered massive support. The
activists reported they presented Obama with a list of demands, including: 1)
requiring the federal government to use its powers to prosecute police officers
that kill or abuse citizens; 2) appointing independent prosecutors to handle
cases involving police officers; and 3) establishing independent review boards
to handle cases of police misconduct.
They reported that the president encouraged them but
reminded them that change is slow. However there is nothing "slow"
about this upsurge of protest activism dominated by youth.
Post-Racial Fallacy
In late 2014 I replaced the cover photo on my Facebook page.
I put up a stark black image that stated BLACK LIVES MATIER, in contrastingly
bright white lettering, Thousands-including people of all races-did the same;
in other words people of all races have acted in solidarity.
This is Black Lives Matters' primary call to White Americans
and other races - that they act in solidarity with the goal of eradicating
racism in law enforcement and the school-to-prison pipeline afflicting Black communities.
The writings of founding member Alicia Garza have clearly stated that she
disapproves of the tendency of some progressive groups to "modify"
the rally cry. "When we deploy 'All Lives Matter' as if to correct all
intervention specifically created to address anti-Blackness, we lose the ways
in which the state apparatus has built a program of genocide and repression
mostly on the backs of Black people - beginning with the theft of millions of
people for free labor - and then adapted it to control, murder and profit off
of other communities of color and immigrant communities," she argues.
Black Lives Matter is a necessary corrective to false
notions that we have a post-racial society, or that that successful progressive
movements (such as Occupy Wall Street) can only build large coalitions if they
are built on the fallacy that class always trumps race. In fact the issues of
police brutality and prison industrial complex cannot be addressed without
acknowledging a racial stigma. Furthermore, America has resisted acknowledging
the plight of impoverished Blacks for so many generations that intentional
ignorance has become a habit. Perhaps "All Lives Matter" dilutes the
message. The power of the movement is that it is effectively forcing the
reality of a racial stigma into the heart of the American consciousness.
++++++++++
Darrly Lorenzo Wellington is a poet and essayist living in
Santa Fe, NM. His work recently appeared in the anthology, MFA vs NYC, edited
by Chad Harbach.
No comments:
Post a Comment