Showing posts with label Harlem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harlem. Show all posts

Sunday, December 21, 2025

Madame Queen: The Life and Crimes of Harlem’s Underground Racketeer, Stephanie St. Clair, A Trailblazing Biography of a Black Female Gangster and Activist in 1920s - REVIEW


by Mary Kay McBrayer

The astonishing little-known history of Harlem racketeer Madame Stephanie St. Clair, one of the only female crime bosses and a Black, self-made businesswoman in early twentieth-century New York.

In her heyday, Stephanie St. Clair went by many names, but one was best known by all: Madame Queen. The undeniable queen of the Harlem numbers game, St. Clair redefined what it meant to be a woman of means. After immigrating to America from the West Indies, St. Clair would go on to manage one of the largest policy banks in all of Harlem by 1923. She knew the power of reputation, and even though her business was illegal gambling, she ran it like any other respectable entrepreneur. Because first and foremost, Madame Queen was a lady.

But that didn’t stop her from doing what needed to be done to survive. St. Clair learned how to navigate the complex male-dominated world of crime syndicates, all at a time when Tammany Hall and mafia groups like the Combination were trying to rule New York. With her tenacity and intellectual prowess, she never backed down. Madame Queen was a complicated figure, but she prioritized the people of Harlem above all else, investing her wealth back into the neighborhood and speaking out against police corruption and racial discrimination.

St. Clair was a trailblazer, unafraid to challenge societal norms. But for far too long she’s been a footnote in more infamous characters’ stories, like Bumpy Johnson, Dutch Schultz and Lucky Luciano. Now, in this masterful portrayal of a woman who defied the odds at all costs, she finally gets her due.

Mary Kay McBrayer is the author of America’s First Female Serial Killer: Jane Toppan and the Making of a Monster. You can find her short works at Oxford American, Narratively, Mental Floss, and FANGORIA, among other publications. She hosts the podcast about women in true crime, The Greatest True Crime Stories Ever Told.

Park Row
ISBN-13: 978-0778310655

Sunday, October 10, 2021

Philip Payton: The Father of Black Harlem by Kevin McGruder - REVIEW


At the turn of the early twentieth century, Harlem―the iconic Black neighborhood―was predominantly white. The Black real estate entrepreneur Philip Payton played a central role in Harlem’s transformation. He founded the Afro-American Realty Company in 1903, vowing to vanquish housing discrimination. Yet this ambitious mission faltered as Payton faced the constraints of white capitalist power structures.

In this biography, Kevin McGruder explores Payton’s career and its implications for the history of residential segregation. Payton stood up for the right of Black people to live in Harlem in the face of vocal white resistance. Through skillful use of print media, he branded Harlem as a Black community and attracted interest from those interested in racial uplift. Yet while Payton “opened” Harlem streets, his business model depended on continued racial segregation. Like white real estate investors, he benefited from the lack of housing options available to desperate Black tenants by charging higher rents. Payton developed a specialty in renting all-Black buildings, rather than the integrated buildings he had once envisioned, and his personal successes ultimately entrenched Manhattan’s racial boundaries. McGruder highlights what Payton’s story shows about the limits of seeking advancement through enterprise in a capitalist system deeply implicated in racial inequality.

At a time when understanding the roots of residential segregation has become increasingly urgent, this biography sheds new light on the man and the forces that shaped Harlem.

Harlem Shuffle by Colson Whitehead - REVIEW


From the two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Underground Railroad and The Nickel Boys, a gloriously entertaining novel of heists, shakedowns, and rip-offs set in Harlem in the 1960s.

"Ray Carney was only slightly bent when it came to being crooked..." To his customers and neighbors on 125th street, Carney is an upstanding salesman of reasonably priced furniture, making a decent life for himself and his family. He and his wife Elizabeth are expecting their second child, and if her parents on Striver's Row don't approve of him or their cramped apartment across from the subway tracks, it's still home. 

Few people know he descends from a line of uptown hoods and crooks, and that his façade of normalcy has more than a few cracks in it. Cracks that are getting bigger all the time. 

Cash is tight, especially with all those installment-plan sofas, so if his cousin Freddie occasionally drops off the odd ring or necklace, Ray doesn't ask where it comes from. He knows a discreet jeweler downtown who doesn't ask questions, either. 

Then Freddie falls in with a crew who plan to rob the Hotel Theresa—the "Waldorf of Harlem"—and volunteers Ray's services as the fence. The heist doesn't go as planned; they rarely do. Now Ray has a new clientele, one made up of shady cops, vicious local gangsters, two-bit pornographers, and other assorted Harlem lowlifes. 

Thus begins the internal tussle between Ray the striver and Ray the crook. As Ray navigates this double life, he begins to see who actually pulls the strings in Harlem. Can Ray avoid getting killed, save his cousin, and grab his share of the big score, all while maintaining his reputation as the go-to source for all your quality home furniture needs? 

Harlem Shuffle's ingenious story plays out in a beautifully recreated New York City of the early 1960s. It's a family saga masquerading as a crime novel, a hilarious morality play, a social novel about race and power, and ultimately a love letter to Harlem. 

But mostly, it's a joy to read, another dazzling novel from the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award-winning Colson Whitehead.

Thursday, April 15, 2021

Hubert Harrison: The Struggle for Equality, 1918–1927 - REVIEW

Hubert Harrison: The Struggle for Equality, 1918–1927
by Jeffrey B. Perry

     The St. Croix–born, Harlem-based Hubert Harrison (1883–1927) was a brilliant writer, orator, educator, critic, and activist who combined class consciousness and anti-white-supremacist race consciousness into a potent political radicalism. Harrison’s ideas profoundly influenced “New Negro” militants, including A. Philip Randolph and Marcus Garvey, and his work is a key link in the two great strands of the Civil Rights/Black Liberation struggle: the labor- and civil-rights movement associated with Randolph and Martin Luther King Jr. and the race and nationalist movement associated with Garvey and Malcolm X.

     In this second volume of his acclaimed biography, Jeffrey B. Perry traces the final decade of Harrison’s life, from 1918 to 1927. Perry details Harrison’s literary and political activities, foregrounding his efforts against white supremacy and for racial consciousness and unity in struggles for equality and radical social change. The book explores Harrison’s role in the militant New Negro Movement and the International Colored Unity League, as well as his prolific work as a writer, educator, and editor of the New Negro and the Negro World. Perry examines Harrison’s interactions with major figures such as Garvey, Randolph, J. A. Rogers, Arthur Schomburg, and other prominent individuals and organizations as he agitated, educated, and organized for democracy and equality from a race-conscious, radical internationalist perspective. This magisterial biography demonstrates how Harrison’s life and work continue to offer profound insights on race, class, religion, immigration, war, democracy, and social change in America.

Hubert Harrison: The Struggle for Equality, 1918–1927
by Jeffrey B. Perry
Columbia University Press, 1000 pages
ISBN: 978-0231182638

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

SURVIVOR BIAS - Nearly a century after it was written, Zora Neale Hurston's book about a former slave comes to print


by Casey N. Cep
Captain William Foster left Mobile in secret and returned the same way. On July 8, i860, he dropped anchor in the waters off the coast of Mississippi, hid his cargo below deck, slipped ashore, and travelled overland to fetch a tugboat from Alabama. By then, Foster and his ship had survived a hurricane, a mutiny, an ambush, and a transatlantic journey, but late that Sunday night, after the tug carried him up the Mobile River to Twelve Mile Island, the Captain emptied his hold, dismissed his crew, and set fire to his ship. The Clotilda, Foster would forever after complain, was worth more than his share of what it had smuggled.
Although the international slave trade had been outlawed in America more than half a century earlier, Foster and three co-conspirators, a trio of brothers by the name of Meaher, had purchased a hundred and twenty-five men, women, and children, from Benin and Nigeria, to traffic them into the United States. The plan had been hatched a year before, when one of the Meahers got into an argument: a New Yorker insisted that slaves could no longer be transported across the Atlantic, a Louisiana planter wagered a hundred dollars that it could be done, and Timothy Meaher bet a thousand that he could be the one to do it.
The market for slaves had grown tremendously in the previous five decades. Absent imports, slavers relied on reproduction and relocation for their supply, and, as labor-intensive agriculture shifted to the Deep South, more than a million enslaved people were forced there by ship, rail, and sometimes by foot, in coffles. By the middle of the nineteenth century, domestic slave prices were so high that many planters had begun lobbying to reopen the global trade.
Among them were the Meahers, who had moved from Maine to Alabama, where they owned sawmills, steamboats, plantations, and people. To increase their holdings and "win the bet, they recruited Foster, a Nova Scotian shipbuilder, and chose the Clotilda from among his ships. Although the schooner was fast enough to evade capture, it had to be refitted as a slave ship, with a false deck to conceal the necessary barrels of water, rice, beef, pork, sugar, flour, bread, molasses, and rum. Foster sailed from Mobile Bay with papers that claimed he was delivering lumber to St. Thomas, and eleven crew members who had not been told of their real mission. The nine thou sand dollars in gold stashed on board to pay for the slaves played havoc with the ship's compass, taking it off course; after that, a hurricane caught it just north of Bermuda. While repairing the ship, Foster's men discovered the hidden deck, and threatened to alert the authorities.
Captain and crew negotiated a compromise, and reached Ouidah, on the west coast of Africa, a few weeks later. After eight days of discussion, Foster traded his rum and gold for more than a hundred slaves from the barracoons, as the holding pens were called. He loaded them onto his ship, and crossed the Atlantic in forty-five days. An estimated two million Africans died in the Middle Passage during the slave trade, but all the men and women on the Clotilda made it to Alabama alive. Neither the Meahers nor Foster were ever competed of any crime, and, after five years of slavery, the survivors of the last transatlantic run were liberated by the Union Army. Free, but unable to raise the funds to return to Africa, many of them banded together to form Africatown, a settlement of their own just outside Mobile.
In the subsequent years and decades, the survivors of the Clotilda gradually died, until only one man answered the door in Africatown when a student from Barnard College came knocking, in 1927. The survivor's name was Kossola; the student's name was Zora Neale Hurston. Their first visit went badly, but Hurston wrote an article about Kossola's life for the Journal of Negro History anyway. After that false start, she returned to Alabama several times to talk with Kossola, trying to learn, in her own words, "who you are and how you came to be a slave; and to what part of Africa do you belong, and how you fared as a slave, and how you have managed as a free man."
Hurston spent four years turning what Kossola shared with her into a longer work of nonfiction, but no pub lisher wanted the resulting book—not then, not when the publication of "Jonah's Gourd Vine," in 1934, made her a celebrated novelist, and not even post humously, after "Their Eyes Were Watching God" had sold more than a million copies. Hurston's manuscript languished for nearly nine decades. Now HarperCollins has published "Barracoon: Cargo.'" Why it was rejected in Hurston's lifetime, and how the residents of Africatown faded from her history and our own, is a story almost as plaintive as the one the book itself records.
Zora Neale Hurston and Langston Hughes were undergraduates when they ran into each other on the streets of Mobile, in the summer of 1927. Hurston was thirty-six, but still a semester shy of becoming the first black graduate of Barnard College; she was down below the Mason-Dixon Line to collect folklore and oral histories for the American Folklore Society and for the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History. She had been sent to tour Fort Mose, a black settlement founded by runaway slaves in Florida, and to talk with Kossola, but hadn't got enough material "to make a flea a waltzing jacket." Hughes was twenty-five and between semesters at Lincoln University, in Pennsylvania; he had gone South to read his poetry at Fisk University and at the Tuskegee Institute. Although Hughes and Hurston had crossed paths a few limes in New York, they met in Alabama entirely by chance: when he got off the train at the M. & O. Railroad Terminal, Hurston happened to be walking down the street.
They went to lunch, then Hurston offered Hughes a ride home. Driving a Nash that she called Sassy Susie and carrying a chrome-plated pistol in her suitcase, Hurston was formidable even in her failures. She'd made a disastrous marriage two months earlier. Now, with her scanty research, she was courting the wrath of the professor who had arranged her travels: the renowned anthropologist Franz Boas. It was her "Barnardese," Hurston said, that was alienating would-be subjects like Kossola. Hurston was born in the tiny Alabama town of Notasulga, and brought up in the all-black Florida town of Eatonville, which, like Africatown, was founded by former slaves in the years after the Civil War. But she no longer sounded like the daughter of a share cropper turned Baptist preacher, much less like someone who had once earned her living as a waitress, a manicurist, and a maid. Her airs, she feared, were not only put-on but off-putting. Still, never one to acquiesce to circumstances, she cadged what she could from the records of the Mobile Historical Society to embellish what little Kossola had told her, and headed north with Hughes.
The two writers took the long way home, stopping to talk with conjurers, tramps, convicts, arid back woods preachers all over the South. Harlem Romantics, their Lake District was Dixie, and their lyrical ballads were the songs, stories, and tales they gathered — Hurston compiling transcripts for her academic work, Hughes jotting down phrases in his notebook He didn't have a license, so Hurston drove: from Mobile to Montgomery, from there to Tuskegee to meet with students, and then to Georgia, where they encountered Bessie Smith in Macon and toured the plantation where Jean Toomer gathered his material for "Cane." They stopped on the way to South Carolina to meet with a root doctor, got a flat tire in Columbia, and then scooted up the coast. By September, they had returned to New York, where Hurston settled down to write her article on Kossola, who was then known mainly by his American name, Cudjo Lewis.
Most of what Hurston published in "Cudjo's Own Story of the Last African Slaver" was cribbed from other people who had interviewed him; by one biographer's count, forty-nine of the essay's sixty-seven paragraphs were plagiarized, the bulk of them from Emma Langdon Roche's "Historic Sketches of the Old South." Not many noticed the transgression, least of all the wealthy white widow Charlotte Osgood Mason, a financial backer of Hughes, Alain Locke, and other Harlem Renaissance artists, who decided to offer Hurston a camera, a car, and two hundred dollars a month to collect more oral histories and folk stories down South.
Papa Franz, as Hurston called her supervisor, and Godmother, as she would come to call her patron, were impressed by how much she learned on her sub sequent trips to Africatown. With each visit, she became less hurried, and Kossola grew more forthcoming. She brought him gifts—Georgia peaches, a Virginia ham. Bee Brand insect powder to ward off mosquitoes—and he allowed her to take pictures of him in his family cemetery and to make a short film of him chopping firewood. With Mason paying her salary, Hurston could take her time, coming and going as Kossola wanted, meeting his grandchildren, visiting his family's graves, going with him to the church where he was sexton, and, in between, honoring the days he did not want to speak of his life in slavery, or of anything else.
When Hurston finally started writing, she dedicated "Barracoon" not to its subject but to Mason, and acknowledged in its preface what her earlier article had buried in a footnote—namely, her debt "to the records of the Mobile Historical Society." In the introduction, she sketched the history of the Clotilda and the geography and the economics of the brutal trade that had ripped Kos sola from his home. "Of all the millions transported from Africa to the Americas only one man is left," she wrote—a man whose voice was crucial because the burgeoning body of literature on the African slave trade contained endless "words from the seller, but not one word from the sold."
Hurston framed Kossola's testimony as the last opportunity to reduce that deficit, and the twelve chapters that follow her introduction consist almost entirely of his words. She renders Kossola's story as he told it, not only linguistically, in his dialect, but narratively, in his own wandering way—sending readers into sad silences and on distracted errands of the sort she'd shared with him, closing the garden gate on them the way he'd closed it on her. "Barracoon" does not so much shape Kossola's story as transcribe it.
Kossola was only nineteen when the Army of Dahomey raided his in land village of Bante, beheading his king and countless others, and kidnapping for the slave trade anyone who wasn't elderly or injured. "I see de people gittee kill so fast! De old ones dey try run 'way from de house but dey dead by de door, and de women soldiers got dey head," he told Hurston, before recalling the way the heads of his neighbors came to smell days after their decapitation. That stench followed him all the way to Abomey, where the palace was decorated with skulls and guards carried pikes topped with bleached bones. It was at Abomey that Kossola and the other prisoners were allowed to rest before being marched another sixty miles to Ouidah.
One of the great virtues of Hurston's book is that it returns the wound of slavery, even in her time considerably calloused over on this country's consciousness, to its raw and bloody state. Kossola could recall with great specificity the actions of Captain Foster, who tore him away from the African continent and made him into an American slave: "De white man lookee and lookee. He lookee hard at de skin and de feet and de legs and in de mouth. Den he choose." Kossola recalled the horror of separation, first from his tribal family in Bante, then from his companions in the barracoon. "Den we cry," he said, "we sad 'cause we doan want to leave the rest of our people in de barracoon. We all lonesome for our home. We doan know whut goin' become of us."
Foster's prisoners were loaded onto the Clotilda, shaved, stripped naked, and locked in darkness below deck for twelve days. On the thirteenth day, they were allowed into the light, and men and women who had never before seen the ocean could suddenly see nothing else. "I so skeered on de sea," Kossola recalled. "De water it makee so much noise! It growl lak de thousand beastes in de bush." Whenever other ships approached, the captives were hustled back into the hold, hidden from the American, British, Portuguese, and Spanish patrols enforcing the prohibitions on the slave trade.
In Alabama, the Africans were unloaded and spirited off to another boat for the trip to a plantation upriver. Captain Foster refused to pay his crew the double wages he had promised them under the threat of mutiny, and the sea men were hurried North to prevent them from revealing the slaves' whereabouts to the authorities. But the Africans were already the talk of Mobile, and a few days after their arrival they had to be moved again so that federal officials could not seize them. Once the proverbial and actual coasts were clear, the Africans were divided among the men who had planned the transatlantic run.
"Cap'n Jim he took me," Kossola said of James Meaher, who started calling the teen-ager Cudjo, and put him to work on a steamship, chopping wood to fuel its trips from Mobile to Montgomery. He labored that way, gruellingly and without pay, for five years and six months. Finally, on April 12, 1865, Union soldiers picking mulberries along the shoreline saw Kossola and the other slaves on Meaher's steamboat and hollered a message at them: "You free, you doan b'long to nobody no mo'."
Sixty-two years later, when Hurston met Kossola, many other men and women liberated by the war were still alive. Not long after she recorded Kossola's story, she and other writers with the Works  Progress Administration's Federal Writers' Project dispersed around the South, compiling the stories that would fill the seventeen volumes of "Slave Narratives: A Folk History of Slavery in the United States." Almost all of those stories progressed from captivity to emancipation, but Kossola's account both began and ended in freedom: even in the final years of his life, he considered himself more African than American, and he could remember clearly an earlier, unquestioned liberty in his homeland.
He could not, however, return to it. Emancipation freed slaves only from bondage, not from destitution; the Clotilda survivors had no way of paying for their passage home. When they resolved, instead, to build a village of their own, it was Kossola who was tasked with asking one of their old slavers to provide the land for it, and he made a passionate speech to Timothy Meaher calling for reparations. When Meaher refused, Kossola and his former shipmates went back to work in sawmills and powder mills, on farms and railroads, and as domestic help, until they had saved enough money to buy the land that became Africatown.
Kossola moved there and married another survivor, a woman named Abile. They had six children, all of whom died in one tragedy after another—illnesses, a train accident, an unexplained disappearance, a police shooting. By the time Hurston arrived, Kossola had outlived his wife and children by almost two decades and was only a few years away from his own death. He was, Hurston wrote, "the only man on earth who has in his heart the memory of his African "Enhanced branding metrics drive robust solutions for scalable monetization of jargon." home; the horrors of a slave raid; the barracoon; die Lenten tones of slavery, and who has sixty-seven years of freedom in a foreign land."
"Only" and "last" are siren songs for writers, alluring but dangerous. Meaning does not always, or even often, consolidate in sole survivors—and certainly it is not absent from those who perish—yet the temptation to imbue temporal accidents with surplus significance skews many accounts of history. Kossola did not necessarily possess greater knowledge or insight or wisdom about slavery or the slave trade than those who died before him, but Hurston was drawn to him because he was known near and far as the last living survivor of the Clotilda.
As it turns out, though, even that wasn't true, and Hurston knew it. Almost a year after her adventures with Hughes in Sassy Susie, she wrote a letter to him from Alabama. "Oh!" she exclaimed toward the end, "almost forgot": she had found another survivor of the Clotilda living on the Tombigbee River, two hundred miles north of Africatown. The woman was older than Kossola, and, according to Hurston, a better storyteller. But there can't be two lasts or more than one only, so Hurston, perhaps believing that Kossola's story would be more valuable if people thought it was unique, told Hughes that she planned to keep this other survivor secret: "No one will ever know about her but us."
Tragically, that proved true. Abandoning her training by Boas, and ignoring the dictates of both honesty and history, Hurston forsook the opportunity to record the story of another survivor. Later scholars have determined that the person Hurston "almost forgot" was most likely a woman named Allie Beren, but no film footage records her face, no known photographs document her home, no oral histories capture her memories. Instead of gathering any of that, Hurston returned to New York, and spent years shaping the transcripts of her many talks with Kossola into a book. When she finally finished, no publisher wanted it. Two houses rejected it outright, while another was interested only if Hurston was willing to render Kossola's story "in language rather than dialect," which she was not.
It is true that the long vernacular passages sometimes make "Barracoon" difficult to read. Yet, in retrospect, it seems probable that the book was rejected as much for the voice that isn't in it as for the one that is. Contemporary readers who pickup "Barracoon" because it was written by Zora Neale Hurston will fail to find much of her in it. As flashy as fireworks in her own lifetime and bright as neon in ours, Hurston is barely visible in "Barracoon"; aesthetically as well as intellectually, she absents herself almost entirely from its pages. That's admirable for an anthropologist, but grievous for a stylist as talented as Hurston. The novelist who would later summon a hurricane in her fiction and suspend readers above her naked body on the altar of a hoodoo priest in her nonfiction resigned herself to the role of scribe in "Barracoon." Like Hurston herself, in those years, the book stalled out somewhere between academia and art.
Characteristically impervious to failure, Hurston responded to the rejection of her manuscript by going to work on "Jonah's Gourd Vine." With its publication, the very thing that had troubled at least one publisher about "Barracoon" became one of the most celebrated features of Hurston's fiction: her ear for black vernacular speech. Affirmed by her success, she became a more confident writer, and began giving her own voice as much expression as the voices of her subjects. When editors clamored for more, she raided her cabinets and turned her earlier field work into a book called "Mules and Men," which returns to the storytellers and singers of her childhood. A second collection of folk lore, "Tell My Horse," goes gonzo into the spiritual beliefs and practices of Haiti and Jamaica. Those books have more "I"s on single pages than entire chapters of the book she wrote about Kos sola. Where "Barracoon" suffers from the lack of a guide, it is clear, in these narratives, that Hurston's voice could lead the Minotaur off Crete.
What is not clear is why Hurston never returned to her earliest anthropological subject. Although she was obviously comfortable repurposing older work, she never rewrote Kossola's story, or tried again to publish it as a stand alone book. In the handful of pages devoted to Africatown in her autobiography, "Dust Tracks on a Road," Hurston explains how her time with Kossola had "impressed upon me the universal nature of greed." She knew before going South that Captain Foster had purchased the Africans, but learned from Kossola that the King of Dahomey had sold them: "My own people had butchered and killed, exterminated whole nations and torn families apart, for a profit before the strangers got their chance at a cut. "It's impossible to know if she abandoned "Barracoon" because of that uncomfortable fact, because of her own academic misdeeds, because of her failure to record the testimony of another survivor, or for some other rea son or for none at all. The manuscript went into Hurston's archives and, for the better part of a century, stayed there.
"Lost" is as alluring an idea as "last," but what happened to "Barracoon" is more complicated than mere disappearance. The manuscript was never missing. It is mentioned by all of Hurston’s biographers, including Robert Hemenway, Valerie Boyd, and Deborah G. Plant (who wrote and edited the introduction to this new publication), and Hurston's time in Africatown was detailed more than a decade ago in Sylviane A. Diouf's excellent and haunting book "Dreams of Africa in Alabama." Yet the astonishing historical confluence of one of the last African slaves in America and one of the great American writers was somehow shrugged off by posterity. When the story of Africatown is told, Hurston is not always a part of it; when her anthropological work is read, Kossola is often left out of it. Many people have watched Hurston's footage of him without knowing that she was the one behind the camera, an experience akin to reading the work of the German philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach and only later learning that it was translated by George Eliot.
Still, if "Barracoon" was never actually lost, Hurston was. By the fifties, her writing had fallen out of favor, and when the sales stopped so did the fellowships, grants, and stipends that had supported her early work. Meanwhile, her politics, like her circumstances, grew dire—she opposed everything from the New Deal to the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education—until she was estranged from the black intellectual circles that had once embraced her. She left New York after being falsely accused of molesting the son of a landlord in 1948; the trial attracted more attention than her acquittal, and those lurid headlines were among the last that she made in her lifetime. She went home to Florida, where she once again found work as a maid, while laboring tirelessly on a quixotic biography of King Herod. She died in 1960, in a county welfare home. During that time, Africatown suffered a similar decline—its founders long deceased, their descendants struggling to preserve the settlement as paper mills and oil-storage tanks staged a toxic encroachment on its borders.
What rescued Hurston from obscurity was an act of pilgrimage not un like the one that she had made to Kossola three decades earlier. In 1973, Alice Walker went looking for Hurston’s unmarked grave. When she found it, she paid for a tombstone; more important, for generations of readers, she brought Hurston back to life. Walker offered no apologies for Hurston’s dishonesty and disastrous acts of self-sabotage, but in an article that appeared in Ms., "In Search of Zora Neale Hurston," she made the case for Hurston’s place in the canon.
Thanks to Walker, we now have multiple editions of Hurston’s novels, autobiography, and other nonfiction, including "Every Tongue Got to Confess," a posthumous collection compiled from her field notes. But "Barracoon" arrives decades late, Hurston’s very first work transformed into her very last—a coda to her career, yet vital to our ongoing conversation about race and reparations. Walker has written a foreword, in which she speculates that resistance to the book over time has stemmed from what Hurston herself found shocking: Kossola's frank account of "the atrocities African peoples inflicted on each other, long before shackled Africans, traumatized, ill, disoriented, starved, arrived on ships as 'black cargo' in the hellish West." One of the virtues of "Barracoon," then, is that it may help teach us to live with uncomfortable truths, not only about the complicated and terrible story it records but also about the complicated and tremendous author who recorded it.

The New Yorker magazine, May 14, 2018.

Monday, September 10, 2018

BLACK ORPHEUS: The philosopher-impresario of the Harlem Renaissance and his hidden hungers


BY TOBI HASLETT

     Alain Locke led a life of scrupulous refinement and slashing contradiction. Photographs flatter him: there he is, with his bright, taut prettiness, delicately clenching the muscles of his face. Philosophy and history, poetry and art, loneliness and longing-the face holds all of these in a melancholy balance. The eyes glimmer and the lips purse. 


     It was this face that appeared, one summer morning in 1924, at the Paris flat of a destitute Langston Hughes, who put the scene in his memoir "The Big Sea." "Qui est-il?" Hughes had asked through the closed door. He was stunned by the reply: A mild and gentle voice answered: "Alain Locke." 

     And sure enough, there was Dr. Alain Locke of Washington, a little, brown man with spats and a cultured accent, and a degree from Oxford. The same Dr. Locke who had written me about my poems, and who wanted to come to see me almost two years before on the fleet of dead ships, anchored up the Hudson. He had got my address from the Crisis in New York, to whom I had sent some poems from Paris. Now in Europe on vacation, he had come to call. 

     During the next two weeks, the middle-aged Locke, then a philosophy professor at Howard University, snatched the young Hughes from dingy Montmartre and took him on an extravagant march through ballet, opera, gardens, and the Louvre. This was the first time they'd met - but, after more than a year of sighing letters, Locke had come to Paris flushed with amorous feeling. The feeling was mismatched. Each man was trapped in the other's fantasy: Hughes appeared as the scruffy poet who had fled his studies at Columbia for the pleasures of la vie boheme, while Locke was the "little, brown man" with status and degrees. 

     Days passed in a state of dreamy ambiguity. "Locke's here, "Hughes wrote to their mutual friend Countee Cullen. 'We are having a glorious time. I like him a great deal." The words are grinning and sexless. Hughes had found a use for the gallant Locke: an entree to the bold movement in black American writing then rumbling to life. Cullen was gaining renown; the novelist Jessie Fauset was the literary editor of The Crisis; and Jean Toomer's "Cane" - a novel in jagged fragments - had trumpeted the arrival of a new black art, one chained to the fate of a roiling, bullied, "emancipated" people. "I think we have enough talent," W.E.B. Du Bois had announced in 1920, "to start a renaissance." Locke drove it forward and is remembered, dimly, as its "dean." Whoever knows his name today likely links it to "The New Negro: An lnterpretation," a 1925 anthology that planted some of the bravest black writers of the nineteentwenties- Hughes, Cullen, Toomer, Fauset, Claude McKay; Zora Neale Hurston- squarely in the public eye. "The New Negro," which appeared just a year after Locke's summer visit with Hughes, launched the Negro Renaissance and marked the birth of a new style: the swank, gritty; fractious style of blackness streaking through the modern world. 

     Jeffrey C. Stewart's new biography bears the perhaps inevitable title "The New Negro: The Life of Alain Locke." But the title makes a point: the New Negro, that lively protagonist stomping onto the proscenium of history, might also be thought of, tenderly, as a figure for Locke himself. Stewart writes, 

     Locke became a "mid-wife to a generation of young writers," as he labeled himself, a catalyst for a revolution in thinking called the New Negro. The deeper truth was that he, Alain Locke, was also the New Negro, for he embodied all of its contradictions as well as its promise. Rather than lamenting his situation, his marginality, his quiet suffering, he would take what his society and his culture had given him and make something revolutionary out of it. 

     Here was a man who enshrined his passions in collections, producing anthologies, exhibitions, and catalogues that refracted, according to Stewart, an abiding "need for love." But even love could be captured and slotted into a series. Stewart tells us that among Locke's posthumous effects was a shocking item that was promptly destroyed: a collection of semen samples from his lovers, stored neatly in a box. 

     Meticulousness was a virtue among Philadelphia's black bourgeoisie, the anxious world into which Locke was born. On September 13, 1885, Mary Locke, the wife of Pliny, delivered a feeble, sickly son at their home on South Nineteenth Street. Arthur LeRoy Locke, as the boy was christened, spent his first year seized by the rheumatic fever that he had contracted at birth. The Lockes were Black Victorians, or, as Alain later put it, "fanatically middle class," and their mores and strivings shaped his self-conception and bestowed upon him an unusual entitlement to a black intellectual life. Pliny was well educated - he was a graduate of Howard Law School - but he suffered, as a black man, from a series of wrongful firings that scrambled the family's finances. 

     Roy (as Alain was known in childhood) was Pliny's project. "I was indulgently but intelligently treated," Locke later recalled. "No special indulgence as to sentiment; very little kissing, little or no fairy stories, no frightening talk or games." Instead, Pliny read aloud from Virgil and Homer, but only after Roy had finished his early-morning math exercises. He was being cultivated to be a race leader: a metallic statue of polished masculinity. But he was powerfully drawn to his mother. Pliny opposed this, and worked to shred the bond. Locke later recounted that his father's death, when he was six, "threw me into the closest companionship with my mother, which remained, except for the separation of three years at college and four years abroad, close until her death at 71, when I was thirty six. "Under the watchful care of the struggling Mary, Roy became a precocious aesthete. And he proceeded, with striking ambition, from Central High School to the Philadelphia School of Pedagogy to Harvard. 

     Alain, as he was now called, fashioned himself as a yearning man of letters. Enraptured by his white professors, he decorated his modest lodgings in punctilious imitation of their homes. Not quite five feet tall, he had bloomed into a dandy, strutting down the streets of Cambridge in a genteel ensemble-gray suit, gray gloves, elegant overcoat-while displaying a shuddering reluctance to associate with the other black students at Harvard. They weren't "gentlemen," and, when a black classmate introduced him to a group of them, he was appalled: 

     Of course they were colored. He took me right up into the filthy bedroom and there were 5 niggers, all Harvard men. Well, their pluck and their conceit are wonderful. Some are ugly enough to frighten you but I guess they are bright. ... They are not fit for company even if they are energetic and plodding fellows. I'm not used to that class and I don't intend to get used to them. 

     This is from a letter to his mother, and the bile streams so freely that one assumes that Mary indulged the young Locke's contempt. But his arrogance followed from the strangulating tension between who and what he was: blackness was limiting, oppressive, banal, a boorish hurdle in his brilliant path. "I am not a race problem," he later wrote to Mary. "I am Alain LeRoy Locke." 

     He'd arrived at Harvard when William James and then John Dewey had electrified philosophy in America under the banner of pragmatism, a movement that repudiated idealism and tested concepts against practice. Locke, who also became a devotee of the philosopher and belletristic aesthete George Santayana, went on to become the first black Rhodes Scholar - though as soon as he got to Oxford he was humiliated by white Americans, who shut him out of their gatherings. The scorn was instructive: the foppish Locke joined the Cosmopolitan Club, a debate society composed of colonial elites, who exposed him to the urgencies of anti-imperial struggle and, crucially, to the gratifications of racial and political solidarity. He finished a thesis - ultimately rejected by Oxford - on value theory, while slaking his sexual thirst in pre-Great War Berlin. He returned to Harvard to earn his Ph.D. in philosophy, for which he submitted a more elaborate version of his Oxford thesis, before joining the faculty at Howard. Mary moved down to Washington, where she was cared for by her doting son. 

     Locke's other devotions were ill-fated. Much of his erotic life was a series of adroit manipulations and disastrous disappointments; Langston Hughes was just one of the younger men who fell within the blast radius of the older man's sexual voracity as they chased his prestige. He fancied himself a suitor in the Grecian style, dispensing a sentimental education to his charges, assistants, proteges, and students - but hungering for mutuality and lasting love. Locke had affairs with at least a few of the writers included in "The New Negro." His desultory sexual romps with Cullen stretched over years-though Cullen himself would flee the gay life by marrying W.E.B. Du Bois's daughter Yolanda, in a lavish service with sixteen bridesmaids and thirteen hundred guests. Her father described the spectacle in The Crisis as "the symbolic march of young black America," possessed of a "dark and shimmering beauty" and announcing "a new race; a new thought; a new thing rejoicing in a ceremony as old as the world." To Locke, it was a farce. 

     He found his own way to stay afloat in the world of the black elite. Pliny had wanted his son to be a race man, and now Alain was lecturing widely and contributing articles to Du Bois's Crisis, which was attached to the N.A.A.C.P., and Charles Johnson's Opportunity, the house organ of the National Urban League. But he stood aloof from the strenuous heroism of Negro uplift, and what he thought of as its flat-footed insistence on "political" art. Locke was a voluptuary: he worried that Du Bois and the younger, further - left members of the movement notably Hughes and McKay - had debased Negro expression, jamming it into the crate of politics. The titles of Locke's essays on aesthetics ("Beauty Instead of Ashes," "Art or Propaganda?", "Propaganda-or Poetry?") made deflating little incisions in his contemporaries' political hopes. Black art, in Locke's view, was mutable and vast. 

     Not unlike blackness itself. In 1916, Locke delivered a series of lectures called "Race Contacts and Interracial Relations," in which he painstakingly disproved the narrowly "biological" understanding of race while insisting on the power of culture to distinguish, but not sunder, black from white. Armed with his pragmatist training, he hacked a path to a new philosophical vista: "cultural pluralism." 

     The term had surfaced in private debates with Horace Kallen, a Jewish student who overlapped with Locke at both Harvard and Oxford. Kallen declared that philosophy should, as his mentor William James insisted, concern itself only with differences that "make a difference"- which included, Kallen thought, the intractable facts of his Jewishness and Locke's blackness. Locke demurred. Race, ethnicity, the very notion of a "people": these weren't expressions of some frozen essence but were molded from that suppler stuff, tradition-to be elevated and transmuted by the force and ingenuity of human practice. He could value his people's origins without bolting them to their past. 

     His own past had begun to break painfully away. Mary Locke died in 1922, leaving Alain crushed and adrift. But her death also released him, psychically, from the vanished world of the fin-de-siecle black elite, with its asphyxiating diktats. As he moved into modernism, he found that his life was freer and looser; his pomp flared into camp. At Mary's wake, Locke didn't present her lying in state; rather, he installed her, alarmingly, on the parlor couch - her corpse propped like a hostess before a room of horrified guests. 

     "The New Negro," which appeared three years later, stood as proof, Locke insisted, of a vital new sensibility: here was a briskly modern attitude hoisted up by the race's youth. The collection, which expanded upon a special issue of the magazine Survey Graphic, revelled in its eclecticism, as literature, music, scholarship, and art all jostled beside stately pronouncements by the race's patriarchs, Du Bois and James Weldon Johnson. The anthology was meant to signal a gutting and remaking of the black collective spirit. Locke would feed and discipline that spirit, playing the critic, publicist, taskmaster, and impresario to the movement's most luminous figures. He was an exalted member of the squabbling clique that Hurston called "the niggerati" - and which we know, simply, as the Harlem Renaissance. 

     The term has a crispness that the thing itself did not. It was a movement spiked with rivalries and political hostility- not least because it ran alongside the sociological dramas of Communism, Garveyism, mob violence, and a staggering revolution in the shape and texture of black American life, as millions fled the poverty and the lynchings of the Jim Crow South. The cities of the North awaited them-as did higher wages and white police. With the Great Migration came a loud new world and a baffling new life, a chance to lunge, finally, at the transformative dream of the nation they'd been forced, at gunpoint, to build. Modernity had anointed a new hero, and invented, Locke thought, a New Negro. 

     But he hoped that this new figure would stride beyond politics. Radicals irked him; he regarded them with a kind of princely ennui. In his mind, the New Negro was more than mere effect: history and demography alone couldn't possibly account for the wit, chic, or thrilling force of "the younger generation" to whom he dedicated the volume. In the title essay, Locke presented a race whose inner conversion had flown past the lumbering outside world. The Negro leaped not just from country to city but, crucially, "from medieval America to modern." Previously, "the American Negroes have been a race more in name than in fact," he wrote, but now, "in Harlem, Negro life is seizing upon its first chances for group expression and self-determination. It is--or promises at least to be-a race capital." 

     Black people had snapped their moorings to servitude and arrived at the advanced subjectivity lushly evinced by their art: their poems and paintings, their novels and spirituals. Aaron Douglas had made boldly stylized drawings and designs for the anthology, which rhymed with the photographs of African sculptures that dotted its pages: masks from the Baoule and the Bushongo; a grand Dahomey bronze. Negroes were a distinct people, with distinct traditions and values held in common. Their modern art would revive their "folk spirit," displaying a vigorous continuity with their African patrimony and an embrace of American verve. "So far as he is culturally articulate," Locke wrote in the foreword to his anthology, "we shall let the Negro speak for himself" 

     The sentence shines with triumph; it warms and breaks the heart. Behind Locke's bombast was the inexorable question of suffering: how it forged and brutalized the collective, forcing a desperate solidarity on people not treated as such. The task that confronted any black modernist - after a bloody emancipation, a failed Reconstruction, and the carnage of the First World War ­ was to decide the place, within this blazing new power, of pain. Locke preached a kind of militant poise. His New Negro would face history without drowning in it; would grasp, but never cling to, the harrowing past. In the anthology, he cheered on "the lapse of sentimental appeal, then the development of a more positive self-respect and self-reliance; the repudiation of social dependence, and then the gradual recovery from hyper- sensitiveness and 'touchy' nerves." So the book's roar of modernist exuberance came to seem, in a way, strained. 

     But also lavish, stylish, jaunty, tart; bristling with whimsy and gleaming with sex. "The New Negro" thrust forth all the ironies of Locke's ethos: his emphatic propriety and angular vision, his bourgeois composure and libertine tastes. "What jungle tree have you slept under, / Dark brown girl of the swaying hips?" asks a Hughes poem, titled "Nude Young Dancer." Locke liked it - but was scandalized by jazz. And though he wrote an admiring essay in the anthology on the passion of Negro spirituals, he also chose to include "Spunk," a short fable by Hurston about cheating and murder. 

     Locke relished every titillating contradiction but shrank, still, from political extremes. Hoping to avoid the charge of radicalism, he changed the title of McKay's protest poem from "White House" to "White Houses" an act of censorship that severed the two men's alliance. "No wonder Garvey remains strong despite his glaring defects," the affronted poet wrote to Locke. "When the Negro intellectuals like you take such a weak line!" 

     And such a blurred line. In a gesture of editorial agnosticism, Locke brought voices to "The New Negro" that challenged his own. Among the more scholarly contributions to the anthology was "Capital of the Black Middle Class, " an ambivalent study of Durham, North Carolina, by E. Franklin Frazier, a young social scientist. More than thirty years later, Frazier savaged the pretensions and the perfidies of Negro professionals in his study "The Black Bourgeoisie." A work of Marxist sociology and scalding polemic, it took a gratuitous swipe at the New Negro: the black upper class, Frazier said, had "either ignored the Negro Renaissance or, when they exhibited any interest in it, they revealed their ambivalence towards the Negro masses." Aesthetics had been reduced to an ornament for a feckless elite. 

     The years after "The New Negro" were marked by an agitated perplexity. Locke yearned for something solid: a home for black art, somewhere to nourish, protect, refine, and control it. He'd been formed and polished by elite institutions, and he longed to see them multiply. But the Great Depression shattered his efforts to extend the New Negro project, pressing him further into the byzantine patronage system of Charlotte Mason, an older white widow gripped by an eccentric fascination with "primitive peoples." Salvation obsessed her. She believed that black culture could rescue American society by replenishing the spiritual values that had been evaporated by modernity, but that pumped, still, through the Negro's unspoiled heart. 

     Mason was rich, and Locke had sought her backing for a proposed Harlem Museum of African Art. Although the project failed ( as did his plans for a Harlem Community Arts Center), Mason remained a meddling, confused presence in his life until her death, in 1946. During their association, he passed through a gantlet of prickling degradations. Her vision of Negro culture obviously didn't align with his; she demanded to be called Godmother; and she was prone to angry suspicion, demanding a fastidious accounting of how her funds were spent. But those funds were indispensable, finally, to the work of Hughes and, especially, Hurston. Locke, as the erstwhile "mid-wife" of black modernism, was dispatched to handle the writers-much to their dismay. He welcomed the authority, swelling into a supercilious manager (and, to Hughes, a bullying admirer) who handed down edicts from Godmother while enforcing a few of his own. 

     The thirties also brought revelations and violent political emergencies that plunged Locke into a rapprochement with the left. Locke the glossy belletrist gave way to Locke the fellow traveller, Locke the savvy champion of proletarian realism. There was a fitful attempt to write a biography of Frederick Douglass, and a dutiful visit to the Soviet Union. But he was never a proper Communist. After the Harlem riot of 1935, he wrote an essay titled "Harlem: Dark Weather-Vane" for Survey Graphic, in which he pronounced the failure of the state and its economic system, but congratulated Mayor LaGuardia on his response to the riot, while also cautioning against both "capitalistic exploitation on the one hand and radical exploitation on the other." Frazier thought this a mealymouthed capitulation; taking Locke on a ride around Washington in his Packard coupe, Frazier screamed denunciations at his trapped, flustered passenger. 

     Locke was middling as an ideologue, but remained a fiercely committed pragmatist. The rise of Fascism saw his philosophical work make crackling contact with politics. "Cultural Relativism and Ideological Peace," a lecture delivered in the early nineteen-forties, took aim at the nation's enemies and their "passion for arbitrary unity and conformity." He sometimes groped clumsily for the radical language of recrimination: inching further from his earlier aestheticism, he praised Richard Wright's "Native Son" as a "Zolaesque J'accuse pointing to the danger symptoms of a self-frustrating democracy." And he remained riveted by the Negro's internal flight. One of his most gratifying contributions was his advocacy of the painter Jacob Lawrence, and his sixty-panel tribute to the Great Migration. (Inspecting a layout of Lawrence's series in the offices of Fortune, Locke exulted that "The New Masses couldnt have done this thing better.") Lawrence had expressed what Locke, with his fidgeting dignity, couldn't quite: the anger, the desolation, and the bracing thrill of a people crashing into history. 

     Locke was still driven by a need for order, for meticulous systems: the project that towered over his final years was "The Negro in American Culture," a book he hoped would be his summum opus. "The New Negro" anthology had been a delectably shambling sample of an era, confected from disparate styles and stuffed with conflicting positions. But "The Negro in American Culture" - he'd signed a contract for it with Random House, in 1945 - was to be the lordly consummation of a life spent in the service ofblack expression. The book is a fixture of his later letters: either as an excuse for his absences ("It's an awful bother," he apologized to one friend, "but must turn out up to expectation in the long run") or as something to flaunt before a sexual prospect. Mason's death had sapped some of his power, so this new mission refreshed his stature and his righteous purpose. 

     But he couldn't finish the thing: his health was failing, he was stretched between too many obligations, and he was consumed, as ever, by the torment of unrequited love. His life was still replete with younger men to whom he was an aide and a guide--but not a sexual equal. "What I am trying to say, Alain," the young Robert E. Claybrooks wrote, "is that you excite me in every other area but a sexual one. It has nothing to do with the differences in ages. Of that I'm certain. Perhaps physical contact was precipitated too soon - I don't know. But I do know, and this I have withheld until now, an intense feeling of nausea accompanied me after the initial affair, and I know it would be repeated each time, if such were to happen again." Solomon Rosenfeld, Collins George, Hercules Armstrong: the names flit through the last chapters of Locke's life, delivering the little sting of sexual insult. By the end, he called himself "an old girl." Yet Stewart's biography aims to heave Locke out of obscurity and prop him next to the reputations he launched. At more than nine hundred pages, it's a thudding, shapeless text, despotic in its pedantry and exhausting in its zeal, marked by excruciating attention to the most minuscule irrelevances. This is touching-and strangely fitting. Stewart's research arrives at a kind of Lockean intensity. But even Stewart's vigor falters as Locke's own scholarly energies start to wane. "Locke's involvement with the race issue," Stewart finally admits about "The Negro in American Culture," "had been pragmatic, a means to advance himself-to gain recognition, to be esteemed, and ultimately to be loved by the people." 

     Love: the word is applied like glue, keeping this vast book in one preposterous piece. Locke's most lasting lover was Maurice Russell, who was a teenager when he found himself looped into Locke's affections. "You see youth is my hobby, " Locke wrote him at one point. "But the sad thing is the increasing paucity of serious minded and really refined youth." Russell was there-along with a few other ex-beaux-in 1954, at Benta's Funeral Home, on 132nd Street in Harlem, after Locke's death, from congestive heart failure. W. E. B. Du Bois and his wife, Shirley; Mrs. Paul Robeson; Arthur Fauset; and Charles Johnson all paid their respects to the small, noble figure lying in the coffin, who perhaps would have smiled at a line in Du Bois's eulogy: "singular in a stupid land." 

     The New Negro was a hero, a fetish, a polemical posture-and a blurry portrait of a flinching soul. But Locke took his place, at last,in the history he wished to redeem. "We're going to let our children know," Martin Luther King,Jr., declared in Mississippi in 1968, "that the only philosophers that lived were not Plato and Aristotle, but W. E. B. Du Bois and Alain Locke came through the universe." Locke's class had cleaved him from the "masses" - and his desires had estranged him from his class. From this doubled alienation sprang a baffled psyche: an aesthete traipsing nimbly through an age of brutal rupture. Wincing from humiliation and romantic rejection, he tried to offer his heart to his, race. "With all my sensuality and sentimentality," he wrote to Hughes after Paris, "I love sublimated things."

Originally appeared in The New Yorker, May 21, 2018
Photograph by Gordon Parks