by Alvin Blackshear | Historian & Researcher
Environmental stewardship is, at bottom, a question about
obligations across time. Debts to future Americans do not appear on a ballot,
which is exactly why a republic must think about them deliberately.
Jill Lepore's history reminds us that government grew to
meet environmental problems the market did not solve; her We the People also recounts efforts, mostly unsuccessful, to write
environmental rights into the Constitution. A few states have gone further,
with Pennsylvania and Montana guaranteeing a right to a clean environment in
their own constitutions. Michael Lewis argues that the competence of agencies,
whether forecasters, scientists or fire experts, is infrastructure. His new
book Blockers includes a federal
scientist who figured out how to stop wildfires from destroying suburban
neighborhoods. Eddie Glaude Jr.'s reckoning with national myths extends to who
bears environmental burdens, the core question of environmental justice.
Here the evidence itself is contested terrain. In May 2025,
NOAA announced that its Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters database
would stop updating after 2024 data, citing changing priorities, statutory
mandates and staffing. The database counted 403 disasters from 1980 to 2024
that each caused more than $1 billion in damage, totaling more than $2.9
trillion in inflation-adjusted losses, including a record 28 events in 2023.
The nonprofit Climate Central has since revived the series with the scientist
who ran it at NOAA, and reports 23 such disasters costing $115 billion in 2025.
Defenders of the report saw an assault on climate science; while the critics defend
the current administration’s ability to shift priorities and budgets. The
database tracks costs and does not attribute events to climate change, so the
claim is narrower: disaster costs are a measurable public concern, and the
quality of federal data shapes policy.
The same question applies to other sources. Further evidence
should come from EPA monitoring data, NOAA climate records and Census
demographic data. EPA removed its EJScreen mapping tool, which showed unequal
exposure to pollution and flood risk, from public access in February 2025.
Volunteer coalitions have posted a reconstruction, and a lawsuit challenging
the removal was dismissed on standing grounds in March 2026.
Four policy areas stand out: Clean energy can lower
emissions and long-run energy costs. Grid resilience matters for
reliability under heat, storms and rising demand. Water infrastructure,
from lead pipes to aging systems to drought and flood management, is a
perennial under-investment. Wildland conservation preserves landscapes
and ecosystems, but are usually in tension with property rights and local
economies.
The hard questions are practical. Who pays, and how are
costs split between ratepayers and taxpayers? Can reliability be guaranteed
during a transition? How are property owners compensated when land use changes?
Can agencies deliver projects on time and at cost? Skeptics question
affordability and dependability, while advocates stress the rising cost of
delay. Both are asking about implementation.
The closing question is moral as much as technical: what do
present generations owe to future Americans, and what institutions can credibly
carry that obligation beyond one election cycle? In the end the question is:
who do you love and what kind of world do you want for them?
Sources:
Jill Lepore, These Truths (W.W.
Norton, 2018) and We the People
(Liveright,2025).
Eddie S. Glaude Jr., Begin Again
(Crown, 2020) and America: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries (Crown,
2026).
Henry Louis Gates Jr., Stony the Road
(Penguin, 2019).
Robert D. Putnam and Shaylyn Romney Garrett, The Upswing (Simon & Schuster, 2020).
Heather Cox Richardson, How the South Won
the Civil War (Oxford, 2020).
Michael Lewis, The Fifth Risk (W.W.
Norton, 2018) and Blockers (W.W.
Norton, 2026).
Ray Madoff, The Second Estate
(University of Chicago Press, 2025).

No comments:
Post a Comment